Social Interaction Design (SxD) Site Audit
Content organization
The content on your social media site depend on user participation, while serving a large audience of consumers. Content on social media should be easy to use by both user groups: participating and active contributors and passive readers/viewers alike.
Navigation schemes and shortcuts like lists, tagging, bookmarking and favoriting all help users find what they are looking for, while also facilitating discovery and surfacing serendipitous relations and connections. Content can also be structured to bring attention to members or to topics.
-
Does your site help users find what they need?
-
What kind of content organization schemes are you using?
-
Are users encouraged to contribute?
-
Does your success depend on their motivation to contribute?
-
If so, what would motivate them?
-
Perceptions, recognition, acknowledgement? (popularity, celebrity, expertise, trust, etc)
-
Page views, friending, topical leadership, etc
-
Would a user's contributions be a natural extension of his or her interests? In other words, would using your site, and contributing to it, make sense?
-
Where else do you obtain content from?
-
Is your mix of user-generated content and third party feeds, articles, and so on easy to differentiate and navigate?
-
How and with what effectiveness are you using rich media?
"Talk" analysis
Any social software site must engage users in talk: in talking about something, and to somebody or somebodies. This talk must reveal something interesting about the member doing the talking, while also contributing the content of that talk to the site for consumption by others. It does nobody any good if a site's theme is serious, but its users are not.
Talk is the "social engine" that drives participation on your site. Users must be motivated to talk, and must find that talk interesting. And in being interesting, it should help the users doing the talking to seem interesting to others, while being interested in talking to or in front of others. There are different kinds of talk, too, including telling, sharing, opinionating, reporting, inviting, recommending, commenting, quoting, and so on.
-
What kinds of talk does your site facilitate?
-
How does it help users to differentiate themselves?
-
What are members "asked" to say in front of others?
-
Does this provide them with a clear means by which to appear interesting to other members?
-
What kinds of talk earn members the attention of others?
-
How long, or short, are the runs of talk on your site?
-
How is the talk self-sustaining?
-
How does it appeal to user's ongoing attention?
-
Does it appeal on the basis of its content (fact), its personal appeal (relationships), or something else?
-
Does your site's navigation support it?
-
Does your site's organization structure it?
-
Do your site's tags, directories, lists, and supplemental navigation surface and engage interesting talk?
-
If your site uses rich media, how well are they embedded in different kinds of talk?
Communication
Social software sites permit two kinds of communication. Members can post contributions to the site, or to other members. It's by communicating directly to other members, and by contributing indirectly to the site's audience, that users get noticed, distinguish themselves, attract attention, and so on. You don't get to control what members do on your site, but you can facilitate and structure user participation so that direct communication is possible while indirect communication is captured and made publicly available
-
Who are your members talking to?
-
Why are they (not) talking?
-
What makes them interested in others
-
What makes them interesting to others?
-
How are you using direct interaction tools (IM, winks, messaging)?
-
How are you using indirect communication tools (posts, comments, compliments)?
-
What are the barriers to communication on your site?
-
What are the benefits, rewards, and incentives to and from communication on your site?